Field guide

How a Memphis Home Health Agency Eliminated Payroll Corrections Over 8 Months

Memphis Home Health Agency · Home Health

Key facts
Home Health Focus
Payroll Management Stack
2 min Reading time

The full picture

Business: Home health agency, Memphis, Tennessee, United States. 32 employees including caregivers, nurses and administrative staff. Patients spread across Memphis metro area with field staff logging visits remotely. The problem: The agency used a combination of a payroll processor and a paper-based visit log system. Field staff submitted visit documentation to their supervisors by email or text. Supervisors reviewed and forwarded to the payroll administrator, often late and inconsistently formatted. The payroll administrator was resolving attendance and visit record discrepancies on average 6 out of every 10 pay cycles. Each correction required 2 to 4 hours to identify, fix and reprocess. The agency had also received a note from their state labor auditor about incomplete documentation on 3 employee records, which accelerated the decision to fix the workflow. The solution: Certiva Payroll Management deployed alongside the existing payroll processor. Field staff submit visit completions via mobile. Supervisors review and approve through the platform. The payroll administrator receives a structured approval chain status board showing what is confirmed, what is pending and what has exceptions. The export to the payroll processor contains only records that have passed the approval chain, with exception flags included for any outstanding items. The results: Payroll corrections dropped to zero by month three and remained at zero through eight months of tracked deployment. The payroll administrator reports reducing payroll preparation time from 5 hours to under 45 minutes per cycle. The agency owner cites the audit documentation as a business-critical outcome: when the state auditor returned 4 months after deployment, the agency produced complete records for every requested employee in under 10 minutes. The compliance exposure that had prompted the original evaluation was fully resolved. Key takeaway: The payroll corrections were a workflow problem, not a payroll software problem. Adding structure upstream of the processor fixed both the corrections and the compliance exposure simultaneously. Book a demo to see how Certiva's approval workflow maps to your field staff and payroll process. Related reading: Payroll workflow management for small businesses covers the structural fixes that prevent payroll errors upstream. Certiva vs. Gusto and ADP explains why the payroll processor is rarely the source of the problem.

Explore a similar deployment

Connect your workflows to the right Certiva subscription path.